Regarding Bias

Regarding Bias

Many news sources have an obvious political leaning, but the fact that their bias is obvious means that their bias can openly be considered when evaluating what that source is saying.

Anyone reading my stuff is also aware that I similarly have strong personal views on technology. Bias is only deceptive when it is hidden. The Wall Street Journal doesn't pretend to be liberal, and the NY Times doesn't pretend to be conservative. I enjoy reading both, because both offer viewpoints and interesting information without pretending to be something they are not.

Hidden bias is used by writers such as Paul Thurrott - he suggests he really likes Apple stuff, only to spin everything he says in a deceptive and negative way.

Microsoft is behind a huge wave of fraud marketing, and has a history of these tactics, from its attack on Linux and its affiliation with SCO, to its regular FUD comments against Apple - including Ballmer's suggestion that the company is not interested in selling Windows for Macs because they only care about "Real PCs." The Zune campaign is a new example.

Being biased is entertaining and engaging - consider Jon Stewart. Even Rush Limbaugh, when he's not making fun of the handicapped, is fun to laugh at; pretending to not be biased is misleading and slimy. So I try not to hide my affiliations and interests. Those attacking me hide their identity, their background, and their real opinions, and proclaim to be "fair and balanced."

I'm not "fair and balanced" in the sense of pretending to speak for ideas I don't agree with, but I am honest about what I say. Mike Caddick, Michael Murphey and others say whatever they're paid to say. That's slimy.

- Dan

I really like to hear from readers. What do you think? Leave a comment or email me with your ideas.